Hello. DE for Germany is also missing, if it relieves you. Russian and Ukrainian support is there, but incomplete. It is a bug due to time pressure. I did not get everything from G11N compiled. I will explain the reasons in an extra blog entry.
I have some very good friends in the U.S., and my criticism is directed against the military industrial complex, exactly not against all citizens. After you asked such a hot topic in a reply-all to many lists that I can no longer post to, I would politely ask you for help please, to forward my response if possible unquoted (for better readability) in a reply all. Thank you. %martin bochnig . On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:51 AM, G B <[email protected]> wrote: > I downloaded and went to install OpenSXCE and chose not to proceed when I > was prompted with the language. Being from the United States of America I > selected English, but there was no option for US, but there was Canada, New > Zealand, Britain, Australia, and maybe another I'm missing. If this was an > oversight on your behalf, then my apologies, but if it was intentional > because of your dislike of the USA for some personal reason, then I'm not > going to bother with your operating system. > > I served in the US Air Force, my uncle was a navigator on a B-52 during > Vietnam, my mother's husband was in the US Air Force in Vietnam, my > grandfather was in the US Army in the Pacific during WWII, another uncle > served 30 years in the US State Dept. A good friend of mine served in the > US Navy in Vietnam. You see, my blood doesn't bleed red, it bleeds Red, > White, & Blue. > > Your largest user base would likely be the USA, but by neglecting to add > the country to the language during installation it seems you are making a > statement, and so am I. I refuse to use it. If you add the USA then I may > look at it, but won't go out of my way. As I said before, if this was just > an oversight then you have my apologies. Otherwise, good luck with your > endeavor. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Martin Bochnig <[email protected]> > *To:* Discussion list for OpenIndiana <[email protected]>; > OpenIndiana Developer mailing list <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Martin Bochnig < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Saturday, June 8, 2013 11:26 AM > *Subject:* [oi-dev] INTEL, IA32, i80686, AMD64 *is* *well* *supported* by > OpenSXCE: Some run it on theit Netbook! - OR: The ability to read a text > and absorb information > > > Unfortunately I was forced to re-join and then re-unsubscribe to finally > debunk some neverdying MYTHS. > > > INTEL, IA32, i80686, AMD64 *is* *well* *supported* by OpenSXCE: Some run > it on theit Netbook! - > OR: The ability to read a text and absorb information > > > I followed the discussion from the archives at > http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2013-June/date.htmland > I'm shocked about all the nonsense that people can claim uncorrected, > about what OpenSXCE is all about. > I have always re-iterated all these technical aspects over and over again, > when I was still on the Illumos and OI lists. > To me it looks as if few ever read even the subject line. > > I also wrote all this to twitter.com/martinbochnig, twitter.com/opensxce, > facebook.com/opensxce, facebook.com/martinbochnig, OpenSXCE's blog > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/ as well as to contributors in probably > hundreds of private messages and skype calls, plus google chats. > > It is a real mystery, why such NONSENSE can be claimed days-long without > being corrected by or understood by the majority (BIG THANKS TO THE GOOD > SOULS, who tried it) : > > OpenSXCE is SPARC-only: WRONG > OpenSXCE is not based on Illumos: WRONG > OpenSXCE will in the future not (indirektly) be based on Illumos modified > OS/Net: WRONG > OpenSXCE is Desktop-only: WRONG > OpenSXCE is instable crap: WRONG > OpenSXCE has "no users": WRONG > Igor's DilOS.org OS/Net doesn't update itself to incorporate always the > most recent stuff from Illumos (except where he has implemented things > better, as you can read on his site or my blog) : WRONG > MartinBochnig never works together with others: WRONG > MartinBochnig never writes technical details to these technical lists: > WRONG > > > See my the OpenSXCE Blog, for example: > OH “DilOS brings in the waffle cones” - Ken Mays / PLUS: *Hypocrisy* > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/oh-dilos-brings-in-waffle-cones-ken.html > > > DilOS-OS/Net: The more I learn from and about Igor, the more I have to > wonder why nobody ever put attention to him! But: He avoids fights. > He rather writes code, code, code > > > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/dilos-osnet-more-i-learn-from-and-about.html > > > > Will you ever notice, that x86/x64 is also supported? > > what OpenSXCE actually is about: IA32, AMD64, sun4u, sun4v. > You and everybody could read this from the beginning on (in bold letters: > *COULD*). > > [OpenIndiana-discuss] A potential new Illumos reference distro candidate: > IA32, AMD64, sun4u, sun4v > http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-December/010922.html > > > I do not bitch around because "nobody uses my distro", because - believe > it or not: That's not the case. > I simply think, that if somebody talks about me or my work, he should at > least have a clue, what he is talking about. And YES: I guess I do have > this humble right, as anybody has and should have. > > If you (most at OI and Illumos) never read what I write, maybe it is > easier to watch my x86 screenshots: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/96825400@N05/sets/72157633874850547/ > > > > To avoid ambiguity I should add: Although these pkgutil'ified SVR4 pkgs > can sit on any filesystem anf can be installed via file:// without httpd, > by default every user gets them from the cloud: > http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/ > What do you say now? > It works like IPS, only 3 times as quickly, plus without all these bugs, > constraints and design flaws. > > > OpenSXCE 2013.05 x86 && x64 Screenshots > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/96825400@N05/sets/72157633874850547/ > > Main Home (thanks to Ken Mays!) : http://opensxce.org/ > > http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/ <http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/> > http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/ > > BLOG: http://opensxce.blogspot.de/ > > OpenSXCE's benefits of using DilOS.org's OS/Net over vanilla Illumos, as > explained to us by DilOS inventor, author and maintainer Igor Kozhukhov: > > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/opensxces-benefits-of-using-dilosorgs.html > > > A fair, open-minded discussion of the 3rd kind > (OR: me explaining everything to a good man from behind the iron fence) > > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/a-fair-open-minded-discussion-of-3rd.html > > > DilOS-OS/Net: The more I learn from and about Igor, the more I have to > wonder why nobody ever put attention to him! But: He avoids fights. > > He rather writes code, code, code > > > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/dilos-osnet-more-i-learn-from-and-about.html > > > > UNBELIEVABLE: Nobody at OI nor Illumos seems to have ever read enough to > figure out, OpenSXCE also supports x86: > http://opensxce.blogspot.de/2013/06/unbelievable-nobody-at-oi-nor-illumos.html > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/user/MartUXopensolaris > https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig > > > > And for the last time: > > > Some of you are that much deceitful and your words are that much full of > hypocrisy, I wonder why only few notice this, or rather: Dare to speak it > out. I have a lot of backers who say exactly the same, just not in public. > Look at my twitter acounts @martinbochnig and @opensxce. Only 2 folks have > unsubscribed, and these are the ones that I blocked unsubscribed myself > first. > > To avoid ambiguity I should add: Although these pkgutil'ified SVR4 pkgs > can sit on any filesystem anf can be installed via file:// without httpd, > by default every user gets them from the cloud: > http://svr4.opensxce.org/i386/5.11/ > What do you say now? > It works like IPS, only 3 times as quickly, plus without all these bugs, > constraints and design flaws. > LBNL: One of the reasons, why it does not have as many users as it > could have: NOBODY at Illumos ever made, nor intended to make any news > release to the more influental news wire channels, such as El Reg. Much in > contrast to the launch of OI in 2010. > Nobody should confuse reason and result. > > > Also about somebody's "He's a talented fellow no doubt, but building a > distro and maintaining a kernel are not in the same league"": I won't post > his private message, just 2 parts: "The development of OI and IPS is none > of my concern. I'm not a distro engineer.". Now my Q: Let alone moral, what > gives him the _technical_ expertise then, to write something like this to > world?! > > 2nd part of his reply: "fuck you!" > > And my response: > > Garrett is only interested in rescuing his struggeling biz. > > You probably need a longer term perspective: It is hard if not impossible > to monetize this "community". Earlier or later commercial involvement into > OpenSolaris will have little chance of sustainability, amortization. Look > into the future: In 5 or 10 or 20 years, none of these businesses will > manage to survive in the extremely competitive LinUX/UNIX market any > longer. All that will survive is the true community, compare it to *BSD. > > And the true community, unaffilliatd from any commercial interests, may > use something like OpenSXCE2018.08 then. > > > Anyways, Good to know ... > > Who is "bitching around"????? > > I never used insulting language even remotely as insulting as "2 different > leagues" or just now "fuck you". > > Well, and do you know: I prefer girls ... > > > > > > LBNL: One of the reasons, why it does not have as many users as it could > have: NOBODY at Illumos ever made, nor intended to make any news release to > the more influental news wire channels, such as El Reg. Much in contrast to > the launch of OI in 2010. > Nobody should confuse CAUSE and result. > > > > respectfully and with full right disappointed > > %martin bochnig > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > > -- regards %martin bochnig http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/ http://opensxce.org/ http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/MartUX_OpenIndiana+oi_151a+SPARC+LiveDVD http://www.youtube.com/user/MartUXopensolaris https://twitter.com/MartinBochnig ------------------------------------------- illumos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
