I still have sunrays in production at our labs. Very little to go wrong and
a lot cheaper to replace when someone should chemicals on them ... But we
recently "upgraded" the servers to centos, mainly so that we had a reliable
desktop with versions of specific Linux centric software. We have wine,
LibreOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird and a modern (read from git) version of
xfreerdp, new versions of windows related software from upstairs meant that
I had to make it work with the technology or change everything to windows
...

If you know of a thin desktop that does smart card hot desking, for less
power than a set of fairy lights please tell me :-)

Jon

On 20 Aug 2016 20:53, "Alexander Pyhalov" <a...@rsu.ru> wrote:

> Gary Driggs писал 20.08.2016 22:44:
>
>> On Aug 20, 2016, at 12:27 PM, Apostolos Syropoulos wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If Sun had understood that it could provide a reliable and user friendly
>>> Unix desktop, I am sure it
>>> would be alive and kicking today.
>>>
>>
>> Apple had a server hardware product for several years and still has a
>> server OS. But if anyone won the Unix desktop war it's them. Tech
>> alone does not make for a successful business. And Sun's attempts at
>> making a viable desktop OS were never well executed. In the late 90s
>> when the Sun Rays first came out my team built several desktop UI
>> replacements for the horrible CDE that they clung to for far too long.
>> But guess who ended up using them the most? The sysadmin team. The
>> rest of the end users didn't give a shit -- they just needed access to
>> the tools required to do their job.
>>
> 
> The SunRay and similar thin client are great. We had more than hundred of
> them. They survived for > 10 years.
> Good term for workstation. They are designed to achieve their goal -
> provide controlled desktop environment
> enough to do your task. Given that most work applications move to web,
> Unix-like terminal is enough for
> business. We still have them in our library. I know local banks still use
> it as operator workspace.
> There had several advantages:
>    you can reconfigure all N clients in one command, as you do it on
> server,
>    they hardly die,
>    they are secure...
> 
> One of my colleagues recently recreated similar terminal environment on
> thinstation.  This product also looked fine,
> but SRSS looked much more production-ready :)
> ---
> System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center
> 



-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to