I worked with United Health Group/Ingenix on their billing/claims
adjudification software, which delt with identifying and matching
proceedures and modifiers, with contractual obligations, inorder to identify
payment discrepencies.

Ingenix is the leading source of medical procedure codes and their
modifiers. The issue we found with identifying and subsequently matching of
procedures from providers, (hospital groups), and payers, (insurance
companies), is that, (as was stated in an earlier post), most providers have
their own codes and almost all payers have their own different codes. Also
procedures are "bundled" in different means between the two organization
types. Basically it's a complete mess in identifying a "lingua franca" for
what is done to patients in hospitals and the subsequent billing issues.

There are standards which are leading the way such as HIPPA/HICFA/Medicare.
Along with all of this there is vested interest in NOT changing the system,
as most contracts would have to be re-negotiated, which would cause risk to
cash flows.

So lots of reasons why things are not easy in US Health Care, some of the
best solutions, (amazingly), seem to come from the US gov.

Rich
________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to