There is a lot of conversation about working collaboratively on this  
board. Mostly regarding results and software to facilitate. I have  
identified four basic structures for group work that I am intimately  
familiar with. I am curious what people are participating in, and if  
there are other derivations?

A) Group think
Multiple people in a group. Disciplines might vary. The group marches  
forward in lock step... while there may be diverse opinions, the  
group makes democratic decisions. This is essentially 6 people  
working as one.

B) Group Input
This is primarily one lead designer, with a regular cast of others  
that provide constant or frequent feedback and ideas. The decision  
process, however, is centralized as the lead has final say and  
ownership.

C) Diverse team
This group has distinct roles that are not duplicated such as... IA,  
UX, Visual, Product, Project, Engineering, Dev... The decisions of  
general direction are made as a group, specific decisions are made by  
the designated expert.

D) Waterfall
This is really group work in name only. Each individual does their  
specific job in sequence following the lead of either product or  
project management.

Just curious... what do you participate in? What would you prefer?  
What is been most successful in your experience? And are there other  
varieties?

Thanks,

Mark
PS - I realize this is rather simplistic... but this venue kind of  
screams for contrast of ideas.

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to