One other key difference, as I understand it, is that iRise has collaboration capabilities, but Axure does not.
On Apr 16, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Fernandes, Fabio (APG) wrote: > We also use iRise, which is much more robust and obviously a lot > more expense too, which has impacted its dissemination internally. > Learning curve is much greater than Axure. Some of us went through > training with iRise consultants. > > The huge downside on iRise, in my opinion, is the fact that you > can't output HTML, you have to use their proprietary reader for > folks to review the prototype and spec document. > > http://www.irise.com/ > > If you want to try something that gives you more flexibility on the > early stages of the project and not have to spend too much time > creating your wireframes, I would recommend Axure. Cheers! Todd Zaki Warfel President, Design Researcher Messagefirst | Designing Information. Beautifully. ---------------------------------- Contact Info Voice: (215) 825-7423 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://toddwarfel.com Twitter: zakiwarfel ---------------------------------- In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not. ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
