On Apr 21, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Brandon E.B. Ward wrote:

> The row below the datagrid is currently called Totals - but it's not  
> very accurate, as an average of averages is not a total.

Before you get to the label, question both the validity and the actual  
utility of any data that include 'averages of averages'; that phrase  
carries a faint aroma of spreadsheet abuse. (Well, maybe not so faint.)

Ask what is intended to be expressed in that row, ask for a plain- 
English description of how the cumulative average is being calculated,  
and then quietly ask _someone other than the person who wrote the  
averaging code_ if their math and their assumptions make any sense  
whatsoever.

Once you've done the sniff test for BS-based math, you should have an  
accurate picture of what that part of the data actually means to the  
people who will use it, and your human-readable label for the row  
should be fairly self-evident.

> What title would you suggest over Totals?
>
> Is there a word that says Totals/Averages/Other? Or is Totals/ 
> Averages my best bet?

There's really not enough detail in your description to tell.

The best bet is to use the term that will make the most sense to the  
intended audience in the context the data will be used. If that  
happens to be 'Slurms/Quatloo' for the given audience, so be it -- but  
it's up to you to understand what you're displaying, so you can  
present it in a meaningful manner.

-Will

Will Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to