Well, I don't know if it's useful or not, but what you're showing is
what I was taught a wireframe is...and it's extremely useful because
as the specs become more specific they can be added in to the
wireframe and you can very closely approximate the current status of
the application/site/product (always being sure to keep a pure copy
of each stage along the way so you can back yourselves out if
necessary). In fact, I've never really understood why the
"visio/omnigraffle/whatever Visually oriented but not functioning
wireframe is supposed to be better.
Katie
At 10:27 AM -0400 5/27/08, Jonathan Abbett wrote:
I do this--
http://www.grokdotcom.com/wireframing.htm
--and it's been very useful.
The author calls it "wireframing," but everyone else in the world says that
a wireframe is a low-fidelity mockup.
Do other names exist for this sort of clickable, text-only, HTML
pre-prototype?
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
------------------
Katie Albers
User Experience Strategy & Project Management
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
