Will wrote: > Why, if wikipedia has no definition or article for > mesch, do they get top billing by google as the best, > most authoritative definition and article on mesch?
That Wikipedia page is volatile. A quick scan through its history shows a pretty decent amount of content as recently as May. People keep deleting it because they feel Wikipedia shouldn't be a dictionary. Anyway, maybe Google should update its Yiddish more frequently, but when they orginally crawled it, chances are it was a pretty good hit. Also, Google has a specific definition command line that I sometimes use. If you search for define:mensch you'll get several helpful results. // jeff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=32046 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
