For Jack's reasons I go with Interaction Designer. "Architect" sounds like an analog rather than what I actually do. In fact, I sometimes describe what I do as analogous to an architect. I'll also use terms like "user experience" in my explanations, which makes people say "Oh - user friendly!" "Yes, exactly."
"Interface Designer" implies, I think, that I primarily design screen visuals when really that's just a minor aspect of my job (and I do that only when there's nobody else on the team who can do it better). I'm an Interaction Designer and it takes some explanation but I'm okay with that. ken ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
