yea, @Jared did a review and there were others done recently juxtaposed to Jared's.
I found Jared's to be very utilitarian (unlike him actually), compared to the designory reviews of the others. In looking at the candidates sites one can't only look at "getting to X page", but one must also look at how they tell their story and convey their overarching message through their visuals and through their content. McCain's use of the word "recruit" screams military and strength, which Obama's screams grassroots action. The "O" Logo itself is probably the best logo design of a presidential candidate in history. While the Star between country first of McCain wreaks of Paton. Then there is the effectiveness measure. How much money and volunteership are they able to get out of the site? This we won't know until after the election. -- dave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=34417 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
