I do wonder about the image for the article in the CTA not linking to the
article itself but to a lightbox window of the image, which isn't really any
bigger than the original image - Make the image a link to the article - get
Fitt's Law on your side - the bigger the target, the easier it will be for
people to read the article about Adrian Chan and his SIxD

- Will

On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Will Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I don't think it's too cluttered at all, but the two article CTAs for
> Social Interaction Primer isn't confusing at all, just redundant, and those
> two pieces or real estate should probably be completely different areas for
> different purposes.
>
> Also - under Books - which of those is not like the others? Kite Runner
> (while a decent book), has nothing to do with the other books which are all
> classic interaction design books - get rid of books and all other content
> that doesn't fit into the ontology of your site.
>
> My 2 cents. But still - a noble endeavor and darn decent design - keep it
> up.
>
> - W
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Alethea Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> visually comfortable in the term of color, but the layout may need
>> improvement.
>>
>> 1) Too much elements clutter the screen. Take the "A Social
>> Interaction Primer" for example, the big tag on the left and the
>> small tag on the right display same information. What's more? They
>> lead to the same page. So I really feel confused what's the
>> difference between them and why put such tags with same content and
>> function.
>>
>> 2) general position. I feel the location of "Johnny need you" part
>> tricky.
>>
>>
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to