Jarod-- just to be clear, I'm not making any claims about Larry's
work, other than to say that in his definition of ACD, he accounts
for goals and other higher-order concepts. This seems to contradict
what Jared posted about at the beginning of this thread: that ACD did
not account for these things. So I'm just asking Jared (not Jarod :-)
to clarify.

James-- I know that you've created a bad persona set by definition.
If the persona set ignores or discards the data, it's not what most
serious practitioners call a persona. It's what most serious
practitioners call a bad persona. 

I'm also hesitant to get into a long discussion of personas here.
That's another thread.

JS


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=35466


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to