Ajax != web 2.0

1.0 = content by web authors.
2.0 = content by website users.
3.0 = constructs by users and software as a service.

So, for web 2.0 there shouldn't be any extra concerns for
disabilities, but accessibility on the web has been a joke for much
longer than the X.0 concept has existed.

Since you likely mean how to do Ajax in a way that is accessible, the
simple answer is, if you think it would need a work around to be
accessible for the blind, you prolly shouldn't do it for the
sighted.

What made the web popular in the first place was the ease in which it
could be used. There were all of a handful of paradigms users needed
to grasp, and really only two to use it. The URL and the link.

Today, software on the web is just as bad as software everywhere
else. Flashy interfaces and wiz-bang ajaxy no-page-loady devices that
act odd due to dubious javascript frameworks like mootools and jquery.

So the short answer is to STOP using ajax and flash for the sake of
ajax and flash. Need an uploader that can multi-select files and
batch upload? Then use a tiny flash tool.

And don't screw with what makes the web easy in the first place.

This is why I say, if you have to think of a new way to do
accessibility, you likely messed your page up for everyone else too.

Just remember, cool and usable don't often go hand-in-hand.
Sometimes you can make something usable look cool, but you rarely can
make something cool usable.


Will



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=36539


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to