Gregor
Thanks for adding in to this. I don't think anyone was attacking
Flex. As a new-ish technology my guess is lots of people have
questions about it.
> 2. Flex is more like a traditional programming language, so while
> Javascript / HTML developers may struggle to get their heads round it
> ("traditional" web developers), hand it to a Java developer and they'll
> be banging the work out in no time.
I agree. Our programmers are all trained in Java and found it easy to
pick up Flex in just a few days.
> 3. You get a lot out of the box with Flex when it comes to both data
> handling and UI. Check out the iLog components and the Degrafa libraries
> for examples of excellent work.
Would you provide some URLs if you don't mind? Also I'm curious when
you rate something as 'excellent work' is that your response to the
code of the library or to the interactions provided by the widgets? I
ask because one of the things I'm looking for in my own application is
more powerful UI widgets - e.g. fisheye menus, tables-within-tables,
and other things that will let me compose more sophisticated
interaction flows for my apps.
Any suggestions appreciated.
Best,
--Alan
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
