Great points, Damon... yes, transparency is a huge issue with this or
any idea. Perhaps putting our electoral system in the machines of
Wall Street is a recipe for disaster! But, enjoying my fantasy for a
moment, there would obviously have to be major gov't/volunteer
oversight... couldn't the same group (with additional technically
trained folks as necessary) who certifies the security of voting
machinery currently do the same in this kind of scenario? 

- replacement software/firmware provided and monitored by the gov't
- only the larger banks that we, the people, are shareholders of
would convert certain of their ATMs (brick and mortar, easily
secured, geographically convenient to the populace)
- print an instant paper ballot (receipt) as a backup that we as
voters get a carbon copy of
- desks/volunteer set up next to ATMs, like polling places
- you'd have to go to the bank counter or another ATM on election
day to get your cash--a minor inconvenience really

Anyway...

I'm sure you're right re: the bureaucratic trip-ups that prevent
innovation... would  be great if this administration did bring some
change to that.

~Susan
--
Sr. UX Designer
www.light-motif.com


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=37630


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to