Fantastic! Very cool. My two cents:
-- If a talk was a keynote, suggest including that identifier consistently; currently missing from IxD09. Suggest a parenthetical modifier as easier to scan (Keynote) By the same token, it might be worth indicating the other presentation contexts (session, lightning round, etc.) as it gives a clue about duration. -- Interactions 08 is a subcategory but there's no parallel subcategory for Interaction 09. We'll want that starting in 2010, yes? So, it might look like this: TOPIC CATEGORY Interaction '09 Speaker Name, Company or School: Presentation Title (Keynote) Speaker Name(s), Company or School: Presentation Title (Session) Speaker Name(s), Company or School: Presentation Title (Lightning Round) Interaction '08 Speaker Name, Company or School: Presentation Title (Keynote) Speaker Name(s), Company or School: Presentation Title (Session) Speaker Name(s), Company or School: Presentation Title (Lightning Round) If we don't want everything organized by speaker name, then have everything begin with the presentation name. IMHO, there aren't so many entries in each category that we'd need to break out subcategories by presentation type. Create extensible parallels in the info org structure and, above all, be consistent! FTW! MJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=40929 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
