"Always ALWAYS do for the user what you can do for them." I wouldn't say always DO, i'd rather say always give the flexibility to CHOOSE, because we never know exactly what all users want or need. Gregor, I totally agree with you. Google search is my top of mind example for this kind of behavior - always send me to Brazil's sites even though I didn't start my search at .com.br Facebook and Youtube ask me (although they ask me every log-in!) if I want to migrate to portuguese version of its sites...
In the other hand, if I always translate some words from portuguese to english, couldn't "Google Translate" always offers me that option right in the first position, as default? This would be still flexibility to choose, but with some intelligence behind it. Regards, Sofia Ferrés ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
