>
> Just pointing out that it's significantly less common.
>>
>
> Really? Because it sounded to me like you were stating some abolute rules
> with neither credible citations nor a sophisticated theory of linguistic
> evolution behind them.
>

Not at all. Sorry if it appeared that way. But please, let's not assume the
worst of each other, eh?

 I'm not sure your German example counts — we're not talking about German
>> grammar.
>>
>
> Is that right? Thanks for clarifying that! Please keep informing me of
> which degrees of likeness and analogy are permissible in this conversation
> and which are offending your delicate sensibilities.
>

Seriously, Christian?

Look, I simply pointed out that we're not talking about German grammar.
German is very different than English, and as such, I'm not sure that a
German example really helps the argument in this case. What exactly was so
offensive about that?

-r-
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to