The VW example leads another question- search v/s filtering. Its always 'faceted filtering' not search, isn't it? For example, in http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder (interact with any one facet, say price $15k- $25k to get this started). Although none of the makes are shown selected, the results are for all makes selected. The act of selected a particular make filters the results. Should there have been better indication that all makes are selected in the initial state or is this a case of good inconsistency from a IxD perspective? -Vishal
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Peter Morville < [email protected]> wrote: > Dynamic beats static from a UX perspective. I agree it comes down to a > question of implementation (cost, performance, accessibility). I love how > results fade *before* you release the sliders at VW UK... > > http://www.volkswagen.co.uk/#/new/ > > ...but I don't love waiting for the application to load prior to > interaction. > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
