In my opinion when you are writing a functional spec it should be complimented atleast with a wireframe. This will set stage for designs which can come a little later than the functional specs and the wireframes.
________________________________ From: Adrian Howard <[email protected]> To: IXDA list <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2009 9:30:33 AM Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] Define a functional spec On 8 Oct 2009, at 06:18, Eugeo wrote: > I think that a spec, as you say, describes what an application > "should do" (function) but not how it should looks like > (structure). I think that is made on the design stage. What do you > think? I think that what the application "should do" and how it should look are often more closely related than people think - and separating the two can sometimes cause more harm than good. Adrian --http://quietstars.com - twitter.com/adrianh - delicious.com/adrianh ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
