I just came across this example the other day tracking an order (so it sticks in my mind)...
https://www.zzounds.com/ordertrack/ It has some obvious issues: the inputs aren't horizontally aligned, and the "OR" text is barely readable in yellow. So I wouldn't call it a good example. I probably remember it because I noticed the problems with it. But the general method of grouping related required fields with text (ex. provide one of the following) is an option; it just needs to be better executed than that example. Since in your case there are only 4 primary fields - all equally weighted, no dependency, that relatively simple solution should work. If the relationship were more complex, such as dependant fields (i.e. if you provide X you must also provide Z) then you might want to go with a dynamic form that updates based on selections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=46747 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
