I couldn't find the details of your taxonomy, could you post a complete URL? Thank you!
I've been known as the UI designer, GUI guy, usability person, and the list is endless. All are fine with me. I have no expectation that my colleagues will be able to hit the moving target of titles subsumed under what I would generally call UCD. My only hope is that they understand the value of the processes and tools that fall under it. I don't understand the distinction you make between UCD and UX. It seems like the definitions can easily be switched around. To me, these are abstractions used to label our processes and tools, of far less importance than the processes and tools themselves. I'm interested, more fundamentally, is the need to distinguish between UCD and UX. I've seen this need expressed before, and I'm wondering what the driving factors are. Jeff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=47132 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
