I'm uhhmming and aahhing about this one. Certainly don't see any killer features that make it worthwhile me putting effort in to upgrading existing boxes, that said I'm hoping to retire some SuSE boxes at some point in the next 6-9 months and replace them with new hardware and CentOS (like most of our infrastructure). It would be logical to go CentOS 6 for longevity purposes, but I do rather like standardisation where possible.
Paul On 11/13/2010 11:31 AM, Matt Simmons wrote: > Yes! Only 6 months until CentOS6 (and a year before I put it into > production)! ;-) > > Seriously, though, it's going to be interesting to see how the new > cloud/virtualization features end up used by companies. The RH-sourced > list of important new stuff is here: > http://www.redhat.com/rhel/server/details/ > > RHEL has a 10 year support lifetime, and 5 was released in 2007, so > we've got another 7ish years to go with it (in fact 5.6 was just > released as well). > > It should be fun! > > --Matt > > > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Edward Ned Harvey > <[email protected]> wrote: >> RHEL6 is finally out. 2010-11-13 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators >> http://lopsa.org/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
