Just to add to this, I can say that internally our community team is
excited to see the commitment put forth on this proposal.  It's possibly
the fastest we've seen a proposal go to commitment organically, thanks
mostly to Jeremy Stretch's cheerleading.

There's a bit of divide among the ServerFault community about whether NE
should exist; many of the SF users feel like network engineering falls
under systems administration and that's why there's a bit of contention on
Area51 about the proposal.  It is my understanding that we will not permit
the proposal to be closed this near to beta--all it needs is the
aforementioned high-rep users.

If any of you happen to have high stackoverflow rep (or rep on any other
stackexchange site), that rep carries over into Area51 -- please commit to
the proposal if you think you'll get any benefit out of the site.  I'm
solidly in the camp of "let them have their time to shine" -- I know I
personally have a few network questions that I'd love to put forth to pure
network engineers.

Pete
MoTS - Stack Exchange



On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Craig Constantine <[email protected]>wrote:

> Is everyone aware of this?
>
>  http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/52519/network-engineering
>
> The proposal is in the Commitment stage. It has 368 people signed up as
> committed. The final hurdle is that only 59 of those people have more than
> 200 points on a stack exchange site. The proposal needs 100 committers who
> each have 200+ points on any Stack Exchange site.
>
> If anyone with +200 SE points is interested, the proposal could use your
> commitment.
>
> If you're already committed, but you don't have 200 points somewhere on
> SE, please consider spending some time to rack up some SE points. If you
> pass 200, you'll instantly bump the proposal towards Beta.
>
> --Craig Constantine, http://constantine.name
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>  http://lopsa.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to