Tom,

The by-laws don't allow for it as a part of the official "process".

Nothing in the by-laws, however, stops the board from committing, as the board, 
to simply appoint the 5-place candidate to the vacancy.

D


On May 7, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Tom Perrine <[email protected]> wrote:

> The bylaws may or may not allow for those kinds of election processes.
> 
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Willard Dennis <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Ah, OK. I knew there would be a reason after I sent my message ;)
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Derek Balling <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You'd want to go through the motions because 4 of the slots have longer
>>> terms (full terms) and one only has a partial term. So "winners" should get
>>> full terms while the "fifth place finisher" can get the partial.
>>> 
>>> D
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 6, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Will Dennis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hmmm... If there's 5 empty slots now, and 5 candidates, considering
>>> Derek's suggestion (which I would say is a good one) then, why go thru with
>>> the election process anyways? (unless the membership can [a] vote for a
>>> candidate NOT to be [re-]elected, or [b] would be otherwise harmed in not
>>> getting to vote, which I cannot see the logic of...)
>>> 
>>> Of course, if someone does throw their hat in the ring (when is/[was] the
>>> cutoff for that?) then there would be more candidates than seats at that
>>> point, and of course an election would then have to be held. Or is there a
>>> write-in candidate process during election that I'm not aware of? Just
>>> genuinely curious as to why if there's candidates =< board seats, why an
>>> election would have to be held...
>>> 
>>> - Will
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 6, 2014, at 4:34 PM, Derek Balling <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> With the recent departure of Mike Julian from the board, is there a plan
>>> to have the fifth-place candidate serve out the remainder of Mike's term?
>>> 
>>> I understand that the By-Laws say that the Board shall appoint the
>>> replacement director, but it seems to me that since we have five
>>> volunteer-victims, and five open slots, that it shouldn't be hard for the
>>> board to commit to respecting the vote and "appointing" whomever comes in
>>> fifth place to serve the shortened term.
>>> 
>>> (On that note, can I ask that the Board, when removing a director via
>>> resignation, maintain the "vacant director slot" on the BoD page, so that it
>>> is easy to see what year that Directorship serves until, etc.?)
>>> 
>>> D
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 18, 2014, at 6:35 PM, unix_fan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As the Leadership Committee (LC) Chair, it is my pleasure to announce the
>>> slate for the 2014 LOPSA Board elections. The polls will open on June 1, and
>>> use the same proven infrastructure (graciously provided by Matt
>>> Okeson-Harlow) and auditor (Andrew Hume) as in years past.
>>> 
>>> There are five confirmed and eligible candidates running for the four
>>> Board seats up for election this year.
>>> There are two returning incumbents:
>>>    Matt Disney and John Boris,
>>> and three newcomers:
>>>    Steve Vandevender, Steve Murawski, George Beech.
>>> 
>>> Please join me in congratulating these folks.
>>> 
>>> In the next days, Aaron Sachs and Warner from the LC are charged with
>>> planning for two LOPSA Live sessions they will conduct in May with the
>>> candidates.  One will be targeted for 6pm EST, the other will be for 6pm
>>> PST. Expect these events to be announced in the coming weeks.
>>> 
>>> Candidates are now asked to craft a candidate statement, publicly post it,
>>> and give us that URL. Expect these to be announced as they post them. We
>>> will endeavor to collect a link to them all on one page.
>>> 
>>> I close by giving thanks again to the candidates and to express deep
>>> appreciation to my fellow LC member volunteers (Scott Murphy, Warner Moore,
>>> and Aaron Sachs) for all their volunteer efforts so far.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Mario Obejas
>>> LOPSA Leadership Committee Chair
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>>> http://lopsa.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>>> http://lopsa.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>> http://lopsa.org/
>> 

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to