On that score, the V3700s are smaller, less expensive, and take up some amount of space that is rather porous by today's standards, but perform well for at least one application that we are doing. (better than old DDN 6000 shelf, fwiw). Ymmv
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:35:49PM +0000, Craig Cook wrote: > > >I'm evaluating proposals for new SAN storage for our HPC cluster. > > > > I would add Nutanix to the list of vendors to look at. I have not > > done on site evaluations myself but I will next time I need to buy a > > SAN. > > > > From my research it looks like very interesting technology. > > I missed the grandparent post (and not in the archive yet?). If you're > needing shared block access, not sure that Nutanix will do that for you > (at least last time we looked at it last year). > > Have been a fan of IBM's mid-tier Storwize V7000 line, but may still be > a bit pricey for you. V5000 is a notch down and also performs well > without as many bells and whistles. > > Ray > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
