I think the last place this left was waiting for a response from the board. Phil, I think that's supposed to come back at the beginning of September per bullet 6 here: https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2016/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2016-08-04-17.00.html
--Colin On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/23/2016 06:57 PM, Edward Warnicke wrote: > > Further, in my mind, if you are a core project you should be able to > > tolerate competition... if you cannot, you are either *not* core, or you > > are in some way failing to serve the community. It is *only* when a > > core project is failing to serve the community that competition is > > threatening, and that is *precisely* when it is needed. > > I agree with this point. This problem will get worse as projects with > broad scope become core. I do not think we would be where we are if the > controller, as originally proposed, were a core project. > > Bye, > Robert > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
