I understand that. However there may be a value in adding a few technical
goals in terms of what the end user gets during the coming year. Of course
given where we are in that process - we will most likely run with what we
have.

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Daniel Farrell <dfarr...@redhat.com> wrote:

> These are the high-level goals we've prepared to turn into Phil/LFN Monday:
>
> https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/69232
>
> That bullet point was just one of many suggestions in Casy's initial
> "getting ideas flowing" wiki. As we worked through discussions I came to
> understand that individual-project technical details were not really what
> we needed, but instead ODL-wide goals relevant to LFN funding.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Timing. The Initial Checkpoint is in 2 weeks. The high level information
>> we need is right now - as we need to give the high level goals to Phil by
>> Monday. So if any of you projects have the high level goals ready - please
>> share - either via the Managed Release Initial Checkpoint - or over email.
>> Whatever is faster.
>>
>> If we receive no information by Monday, as a backup we can always say
>> that the Fluorine release content is not ready yet - and will be added in 2
>> weeks.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Farrell <dfarr...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We should just use the Managed Release Initial Checkpoint for this, vs
>>> making projects duplicate effort. It has a high level description
>>> requirement designed with exactly this in mind.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:43 PM Abhijit Kumbhare <abhijitk...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On a related note, projects - please let us know your high level goals
>>>> as well. This would be needed to address the following question in the
>>>> OpenDaylight Goals for 2018:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    - What are the most important features or other technical aspects
>>>>    of OpenDaylight to be accomplished this year?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It would be great if this is in a concise in the form of 2-3 bullets.
>>>> Please especially restrict to high level features / aspects only -
>>>> either the ones which would be relevant on an OpenDaylight wide level or
>>>> significantly enhance your project or the usability of your project.
>>>>
>>>> For the sake of speed & simplicity- you can add just reply-all to this
>>>> thread.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Kit Lou <klou.exter...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good point An!
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a value "NOT_Integrated (UnManaged)" also - maybe opflex can
>>>>> use this value for now?   Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Kit Lou
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:10 PM, An Ho <an...@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Kit,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should we have a field for Unmanaged projects in Oxygen that are not
>>>>>> part of the Common Karaf Distribution (i.e. OpFlex).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An Ho
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:
>>>>>> release-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Farrell
>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, March 05, 2018 12:54 PM
>>>>>> *To:* Kit Lou <klou.exter...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> *Cc:* Release <rele...@lists.opendaylight.org>
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [release] [Action Request for Oxygen Projects] Report
>>>>>> Oxygen Project Details by 18:00 UTC March 8
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that this will be used for marketing the Oxygen release, so
>>>>>> please do keep it very high level. One or two paragraphs, understandable 
>>>>>> by
>>>>>> the average person at ONS. Please be sure to highlight things that would 
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> interesting to external consumers, like LFN projects or users.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 2:50 PM Kit Lou <klou.exter...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Oxygen Projects,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Based on the TWS call earlier today, we are asking for a high-level,
>>>>>> human-readable description of what each project did in the oxygen 
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>> This should be submitted as a Jira *Project Plan *issue against the
>>>>>> TSC project. This will be reused for external communication/marketing for
>>>>>> the release.  Please create a new *Project Plan* issue in the *tsc*
>>>>>> project as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ·  Select your project in the *ODL Project* field
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ·  Select the Oxygen version value in the *ODL Release* field
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ·  Select the appropriate value in the *ODL_Participation* field: S
>>>>>> NAPSHOT_Integrated (Managed) or RELEASE_Integrated(Managed) **For
>>>>>> most projects, you should choose the first value.  The second value only
>>>>>> applies to ODLParent and Yangtools for now*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ·  Select the value Final in the *ODL_Checkpoint* field
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ·  In the *Summary* field, put something like: Project-X Oxygen
>>>>>> Release details
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ·  In the *Description* field, fill in the details of your
>>>>>> accomplishments
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please refer to [1] as a template.  We ask that you complete this
>>>>>> action no later than the start of the TSC meeting this week - 10 AM PST 
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> 18:00 UTC Thursday, March 8.  Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kit Lou
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/TSC-7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> release mailing list
>>>>> rele...@lists.opendaylight.org
>>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TSC mailing list
>>>> t...@lists.opendaylight.org
>>>> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/tsc
>>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.opendaylight.org
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to