but, it's showing up as a dependency in the autorelease dependencies log. Can/Should we just remove it entirely instead of just not building it?
JamO On 3/28/18 1:14 PM, Sam Hague wrote:
netvirt has removed the building of the dlux ui feature already so archiving is fine with netvirt. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Farrell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks for looking into that Daniel. I'll reach out to those projects to advise them that they should consider cutting their dependency on DLUX. I assume by your wording (and if I recall correctly, past discussions) that you're okay with archiving DLUX? Thanks, Daniel On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:28 AM Daniel Malachovský <[email protected]> wrote: Hi,____ __ __ Thanks for bringing this up. Unfortunately, i can’t attend meeting.____ __ __ Based of my searches, here is the list of projects with some GUI based on DLUX: ____ Bier____ Centinel____ dluxapps (it will die with DLUX as well probably)____ groupbasedpolicy____ honeycomb/vbd____ iotdm____ lispflowmapping____ nemo____ netvirt sdninterfaceapp systemmetrics unimgr____ usc____ __ __ I don’t know in which state those GUis are and if are still being used or not.____ __ __ dano____ __ __ *From:*Abhijit Kumbhare [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] *Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2018 11:05 PM *To:* Daniel Farrell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; tsc <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Daniel Malachovsky -X (dmalacho - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> *Subject:* Re: [release] [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] DLUX Project status____ __ __ Added.____ __ __ On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Daniel Farrell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:____ Resurrecting an old thread, My understanding is that we're planning on archiving DLUX in Fluorine.____ __ __ If anyone objects to that, please speak up ASAP.____ __ __ @Abhijit - Can we add a vote on this to the TSC's agenda tomorrow?____ __ __ Thanks,____ Daniel____ On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:34 PM Robert Varga <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:____ On 09/02/18 21:21, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > Daniel & DLUX project, > > Please note the TSC meeting minutes: > > https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2018-February/008836.html <https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/tsc/2018-February/008836.html> > > The consensus was that due to the lack of development resources - and > security vulnerabilities that there is a lack of bandwidth to fix - the > TSC thinks that it would be better to mark DLUX deprecated in Oxygen and > to remove it in Fluorine. What is your opinion on this? Do you have any > other suggestions or options? Ultimately it is the project's decision - > but do give it a thought and let us know. [+release, +discuss] as this boils down to a wider discussion. Do we need a UI framework, and if so, what do projects need from such a framework? Regards, Robert____ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>____ __ __ _______________________________________________ release mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release <https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release> _______________________________________________ release mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/release
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
