Hi Luis, Thanks for your reply. From the bulk-o-matic.doc link that you provided, it looks like the functionality is for Pushing the flows directly into the datastore.
What I was looking is to involve the datastore, for the flows which controller generates for the incoming Packet_INs. Basically I was trying to measure the throughput of handling of Packet_Ins by ODL by involving the datastore. Thanks, Vinod On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:26 PM Luis Gomez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Vinod, for datastore flow push test we use different application called > bulkomatic: > > > https://github.com/opendaylight/openflowplugin/blob/master/applications/bulk-o-matic/src/site/asciidoc/bulk-o-matic.adoc > > Some tests running this: > > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-1node-perf-bulkomatic-only-fluorine/plot/Java%20Performance/ > > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/openflowplugin/job/openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-perf-bulkomatic-only-fluorine/plot/Java%20Performance/ > > BR/Luis > > On Dec 11, 2018, at 6:12 AM, Vinod Ramachandra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello All, > I hope this is the right place to ask about a query of mine related to > usage of ODL with Cbench. > > Issue: > ODL drop-test app is generating very few FLOW_MODs per second(~30 Flow_Mod > per second) > > Setup: > I'm running Opendaylight against Cbench. After going thorugh many of the > previous posts on cbench, I have insatlled the following features on ODL. > Features: > 1. "odl-openflowplugin-southbound", > 2. "odl-openflowplugin-flow-services", > 3. "odl-openflowplugin-app-table-miss-enforcer", > 4. "odl-openflowplugin-app-forwardingrules-sync", > 5. "odl-openflowplugin-drop-test", > > I have set *dropallpackets on*. Cbench is run in latency mode. ODL is > able to respond to very few Packet_Ins per second(~30 packet_in per sec). > The Integration_Group's Performance_Tests#Known_Issues indicate that > *dropallpackets > *doesnot work well and flows get hung after a while. However it seems to > be old report of Performance tests. > Could someone please confirm if the issue of *dropallpackets *still > exists? Or Please share some more setup information related to above > scenario. > > > > P.S: I understand that *dropallpacketsrpc on *could be used to bypass the > datastore and get the FLOW_MODs. I have tested this and > *dropallpacketsrpc* is working fine. However i would like to get the > datastore involved while responding to PACKET_INs. > > > Thanks, > Vinod > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
