Or just say "OSI-compliant" -- since that's what OSGeo's charter says..?
-mpg > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ned Horning > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:12 PM > To: 'OSGeo Discussions' > Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] "Free" > > Paul Ramsey wrote: > > > > The term "free" as used by this community is jargon > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jargon>, plain and simple, completely > > transparent to those in-the-know, opaque to outsiders. The workshop > > submission is just a clear example of that. > > > Would dropping "Free" and just using "Open Source" in the > future make it > transparent to everyone? > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
