Landon Blake wrote:
This is really good feedback, and has helped me reevaluate my original
idea. What about using Wikinfo instead? It seems that they have some
more reasonable and flexible policies on content and editing.
http://www.internet-encyclopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page
In fact, I think there article on GIS is better that the one on
Wikipedia:
http://www.internet-encyclopedia.org/index.php/Geographic_information_system
I've modified my page on the OSGeo to reflect this possible change:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php/Wikipedia_Entry_Maintenance
A quick scan of Wikinfo would seem to indicate that it intends filling the
gaps that wikipedia has forcefully created. But I think it needs a lot more
input yet - there are lots of red links in the sections I went through :)
Thanks for the link - it looks like it will solve my other problems as well!
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://home.lsces.co.uk/lsces/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk
MEDW - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
