2007/12/26, Miguel Montesinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi to everybody,
>
> - Alfonso Rubio (Top Manager at ESRI Spain): [2] "from an intellectual point 
> of view, I wonder that if free software is a software with freedom to be 
> modified at any time, that is just the opposite of guaranteeing that we are 
> able to work with standards, because any user, or even any implementation, 
> can modify it"
>
> - A. Rubio (ESRI) in a 2nd talk: [3] "it seems that standard support is less 
> guaranteed with free software from an intellectual point of view"
> and finally: "a standard -in the end- is a boring thing"
>
> - Rubén Andreani (Top Manager at Intergraph Spain): [4] "How much does it 
> cost to make a software and to maintain it? There's a gossip which says that 
> a version of a GIS software costs around 100-200 million $ ... so, obviously 
> the software cannot be free (for *gratis*) because money has to come from 
> anywhere."

wow,

Those guys are really into FUD. However, that is an _old_ FUD that has
been dispelled in the las 5 years due to the enormous success achieved
by free operating systems, and database engines.

Also, ESRI Spain is shooting its own foot, as GDAL/OGR (and PROJ) is
free software and built inside Arc*.

cheers!
-- 
Paulo Marcondes = PU1/PU2PIX
-22.915 -42.224 = GG86jc
Debian GNU/Linux = http://rj.debianbrasil.org = http://www.debian.org
http://www.kombato.org - Seja seu próprio guarda-costas
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to