2) Are project PSCs actually willing and interested in identifying
contributors in a formal way? It would be up to projects to decide
what criteria they want and to notify webcom of their
> contributors in some fashion.
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Perhaps some projects would like to divide contributors into categories
(developer, translator, training & consultant, end-user support, etc.)
Mateusz,
I don't mind what projects do on their own web site in this regard. But
for the purposes of SPD prioritization I'm not keen on making it this
complicated. I am suggesting the "contributor" column would have just
the names of projects which have identified the SPD listed organization
as a contributor.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
