On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 16:24 -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote: > On Feb 21, 2008, at 4:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > What it comes down to is what is appropriate for your use case. > > Indeed! However, there seem to be vanishingly few use cases for which > raster-in-database is actually the more appropriate solution. > > (BTW, point-in-time recovery, a nice example of a place where database > semantics have an upper hand. Although more modern file systems and > enterprise backup systems are pretty competitive now... even a > relatively simple hack like the OS/X Time Machine feature solves that > problem for-all-practical-purposes.)
Completely off the wall thought, but what about using git? Tim > > P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
