Everytime I listen this discussion about proprietary vs. open-source software, 
a lot of feelings, impressions and opinions come up.
 
Talking about subjective things it's funny, but it doesn't help newcomers, nor 
it's professional. In the meanwhile the dark-side ;) keeps on spreading the 
same rumours.
 
Only through a serious comparison anybody can get the picture.
 
Does anybody have or know a base feature table, so that we could fill in with 
proprietary and OS fulfillment? [1] IMHO is quite generic, and does not include 
non-OS features. Non-ArcXXX should also be considered (I've also worked with 
non-ESRI products, and they offer really good features).
 
Anybody open to work in this direction?
 
This way, anybody will be able to compare with real and common informationn and 
I'm sure that 

One additional point. When migrating desktop GIS from proprietary to OS 
software, it's usual to hace different levels of users. A big number of users 
(80% according to some gvSIG studies) use a small percentage of available 
functionalities.

So it is recommended that a gradual migration could be done.

 
[1] http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/Desktopgis_overview.htm 
<http://www.spatialserver.net/osgis/Desktopgis_overview.htm> 

 

Regards

 
---------------------------------

Miguel Montesinos

Director Técnico

PRODEVELOP

C/ Conde Salvatierra, 34 - 10

46004 Valencia. Spain

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.prodevelop.es

Tlf: +34 963510612

 

 


________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre 
Grobler
        Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:35 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OS and Proprietary
        
        

        Hi Micha & Dan re:  Ease of use - This is great news! It really gets me 
excited, working with Q-GIS probably should have given me a clue.

         

        Puneet, in short neither, took out a loan to get ArcView and have to 
finish work from previous employer before I can start to earn money. Please 
note I didn't complain about "cost" of entry, just stated which choices I 
faced, which I think suited the discussion at that point.

         

        André Grobler

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to