+1 It's a useful mnemonic, and with 304 redirection the search engines will still provide link karma to links that use the *.osgeo.org scheme.
P. On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Mateusz Loskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Markus Neteler wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Jason Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think that it was specifically dropped, it just wasn't made a >>> requirement for new projects coming into OSGeo. >>> >>> There are project pages on the OSGeo site (like >>> http://www.osgeo.org/grass - just product info "fliers") but from there >>> the project URL can be anything from external host-based (like >>> http://grass.osgeo.org/ - which is non-canonical, this seems to be the >>> same as grass.itc.it) >> >> Jason, >> >> grass.itc.it and others are the mirror sites of http://grass.osgeo.org/ >> (which >> is the master site). >> >> @All: >> I would appreciate to see all projects using the "project.osgeo.org" >> scheme, even only with a redirection. Just to apply a generic scheme >> and provide transparency to our users... > > > +1 > > -- > Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net > Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
