Miguel Montesinos wrote:
>> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] en nombre de Dave Patton
>> Enviado el: sáb 18/10/2008 18:22
>> Para: OSGeo Discussions
>> Asunto: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESRI Spain conference incident
>>
>>
> 
>> On 2008/10/17 12:15 AM, Jorge Gaspar Sanz Salinas wrote:
>>> Hi All, I resend this mail to OSGeo discuss because I think is a
>>> serious incident that cannot be obviated and shows how things are
>>> getting at least in Spanish market.
>>> As Alvaro says, why they have this behavior with his colleagues? Maybe
>>> they fear FOSS companies?
>>>
>>> Anyway, all of you are invited to the gvSIG conf, even to discuss,
>>> it's free in both senses ;)
>> ESRI was a sponsor at FOSS4G 2007, and had a Lab.
>> Who knows, maybe they will be involved somehow in
>> FOSS4G 2009(for sure they won't be excluded just
>> because they are viewed as competition for FOSS).
> 
> "Viewed as competition for FOSS" -> Well, they say (I asked about it at 
> ESRI's booth during both FOSS4G 2007 & 2008) that they have made some 
> contributions to open-source, as the openness of shapefile format or offering 
> WMS servers. :-D
> 
> 
>> Perhaps they can have a booth in the exhibition
>> (and maybe gvSIG wants to have a booth right next
>> to the ESRI booth ;-)
> 
> For sure FOSS4G ESRI's attendees are much more polite (and clever) than their 
> Spanish collegues.
> 
> Maybe it would be wiser to make a request for a booth in the world annual 
> ESRI's conference (I don't know nor want to, the exact name). Would they 
> admit a FOSS4G booth (it doesn't matter which project could be) as we make at 
> FOSS4G? It would be funny to see an OSGeo booth showing the integration 
> capabilities of OSGeo projects against ESRI closed products, or even a 
> comparison.
> 
If we called it a Proj,Python,OGC booth they'd have a hard time saying
no considering their inclusion of said products/standards in their
application.

Alex

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to