Andrea, Why don't just let him get access to the MapServer vs Geoserver comparative you and Jeff presented at the last FOSS4G conference?
I mean... if he wants to know what is the best option.. that should be a very very useful material. He doesn't need a discussion, he needs help. On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 21:46 +0100, Andrea Aime wrote: > Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: > > Stefan Steiniger wrote: > >> same for me - I stumbled over this page after a hint from Markus - and > >> nobody ever asked us to have a look over it or send an email. > > > > Stefan, > > > > Please try to understand what Rafal says. > > It was intentional and it was part of the idea of the evaluation > > made in frame of the CASCADOSS project. > > > > There is no point in making outraged debate if this idea was right or not, > > as it would be a never-ending story. > > It would be better to consider it as a software benchmark. > > It is not possible to create a benchmark that is completely and > > fully objective and makes happiness and peace in every corner of all geeky > > mindship. > > Every study makes particular assumptions, so CASCADOSS study does. > > > > The point is to review current status and make it better. > > Checking open source software against its documentation is like > evaluating commercial software against the help you can get on > community driven forums (if there are any). > > Anyways, I agree this discussion would not take us anywhere > and I won't comment any further. > > Cheers > Andrea > > -- Mauricio Miranda Software Engineering Manager www.xoomcode.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss