The question is what you mean by hosting?
If you ask why we are not an OSGeo project then the answer from Yves is correct: we did not apply.

Although I have written/filled most documents necessary and we also have people who would support us in the incubation process the problem is that we simply don't have the resources to put an OSGeo membership into place. We are a pure voluntary project since a while and almost all of us work in their free time on improving OpenJUMP. Hence, I don't want to impose any management and control structures and schedules on any of us, and I am just happy if one of us founds time to improve OJ.

Subsequently and despite that fact that we had a positive vote for joining OSGeo about 2 years ago, I decided that every minute spent on the project is better spent with answering user emails and coding & bug fixing than with putting in efforts for (i) establishing and maintaining OSGeo conform management structures, (ii) reviewing code (for license issues), and (iii) moving infrastructure to OSGeo servers etc. Its not that I think the OSGeo demands a lot of management overhead, and I personally see that the OSGeo structures are there to ensure the quality of software and project management. But we simply don't have the people that can spend that much time on that (including me).

Fortunately we have been able to run the OpenJUMP/Jump-Pilot project the way we do now for about 4 years, and I more or less hope it can continue this way. I also think we worked one the bus-factor ;) so one/I can be half a year off without any serious implications.

I hope my lengthy answer answers what you want to know. And I also hope that this email make some people think about all the volunteer efforts that are done by committed people in the software projects.

cheers,
stefan

Yves Jacolin wrote:
Fashad,

Le mercredi 04 août 2010 15:24:56, Fahad Rasheed a écrit :
Why osgeo not hosting open jump?
because they didn't ask it ;)

Regards,

Y.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to