Thanks for following up on what was an excellent series of WPS presentations at foss4g this year.
I was amazed to see so many presentations devoted to WPS. One that really stood out as a usage report was the EnviModel presentation. Using WPS, R stats, and numerous other components to get the job done. Hopefully we can get more case studies next year. With respect to your testing of zoo - you may wish to pass this information on as a blog post so it shows up on osgeo planet along with the other foss4g summaries. Jody On 20/09/2010, at 6:45 PM, Gérald Fenoy wrote: > Hi All, > > Several WPS related presentation at FOSS4G2010 including the one entitled > "Compliance testing of Open Source Software for Web Processing Services" took > place this year [1]. > > The presentation above reported about some incorrect results about the > ZOO-WPS implementation. So the ZOO-Tribe decided to provide a report based on > the same techniques than the one used in above presentation and clarify of > the ZOO Kernel valid XML responses using only Open Source software to run the > tests. > > The results of our tests are available on wiki page on the official ZOO > Project Trac system [2] where you can read the results we got when running > the validity tests for each requests discussed during the conference. As we > are in an Open Source community we also provided a tool [3] to run the tests > on your own using a simple bash script (working also on GNU/Linux and MacOS > X). This way you can ensure that tests made were appropriate. Based on this > tool we created another script which provides periodically a web report > available on the ZOO-Project web site [4]. > > Contrary to what was said during in [1], all the tests made was successfully > validated. Nevertheless, on the OGC external wiki [5], we noticed that the > URLs used to run tests on the ZOO Kernel response validity was wrong so we > have corrected it on this wiki page also. > > Finally the conclusion to this test are the following : > > a) ZOO Kernel provide XML document in responses to WPS request which are all > valid, > b) ZOO Kernel support all the Execute request type > > I hope you can take few minutes of your busy time to read the report and > check by yourself that everything is working fine with the ZOO Kernel and > maybe even more in the form of a a generic way to test our WPS implementation > responses validity which will be useful for future testing. > > Best regards, > > [1] http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_show.php?id=3604 > [2] http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/wiki/ZOOWPSImplementationReport > [3] > http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/attachment/wiki/ZOOWPSImplementationReport/testXmlValidation.sh > [4] http://zoo-project.org/ZOODEMOREP/demoReport1.html > [5] > http://external.opengeospatial.org/twiki_public/bin/view/WPS/ComplianceTestingResults2010 > > Gérald Fenoy > ZOO PSC Chair > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
