Hi,
WFS 1.1.0 is indeed not saying anything on the order of axis explicitly.
And I think you can't find anything on axis order in WFS 1.1.0, since
axis order is defined in the CRS definition (not by WFS). So I'd say it
is the other way around: why /not/ respect axis order? There is nothing
in the WFS spec indicating that you are allowed to neglect the
definition of the CRS.
So, assuming you are using a URN notation (for example
urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326), this implies that you are using the axis
order as defined by the CRS identified by that URN
(http://www.epsg-registry.org and then "retrieve by code"). And that's it.
Thijs
On 02/08/2012 11:33 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
Hi,
please, can anybody point me to the document and page, where it is
written, that WFS 1.1.0 should respect axis order of the coordinate
reference system? I really tried to find this out - no success.
Thanks
Jachym
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
