Hi Cameron, I don't mind a public response.
I feel the OSGeo Conference Committee is very important. I would enjoy taking an active role in it again. I feel it should be revived as soon as possible. I don't exactly know the correct process to name a chair - I am interested in being the chair, but we need to make sure we follow correct process. I'll ping the conference list to discuss all of that. Regarding the OSGeo-Advocate page (I will speak freely, I hope that is ok): one point that always hits my brain as I click on that page, is, how do you decide the ordering of countries on that page? Is there logic used? Otherwise, my brain wants an alphabetical listing (or a note above that explains the ordering); it seems to me to be very unorganized. I hope you don't take offense to that comment (I just don't want to start editing the wiki and stepping on toes, which, I have a habit of doing too often). Indeed it is impressive seeing all the great names on that page, such talented people! Talk soon, -jeff On 12-07-24 5:34 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > Jeff, > Sent personally, but you are welcome to email your response publicly. > Thanks for clarifying your position. > > I'm interested to hear where you stand on the OSGeo Conference > Committee, which I understand is lacking a chair, and is currently very > quiet. Is this something you are interested in taking a more active role > in again? (You certainly have the prior experience) > > And as a bit of an unfair plug, I'm hoping that you could update your > OSGeo-Advocate page, in the template format described here: > > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Advocate#Process_for_becoming_an_OSGeo_Advocate > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss