I don't want to be a PITA, but I want to bring up another point for discussion.

Is it a good idea for people from the selection committee to be nominating? 
That kind of defeats their "neutral" position.

Or how does the selection committee normally come to a decision? Consensus, 
voting, something else?

Best regards,
Bart

-- 
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS - http://osgis.nl

On Sep 18, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Jeff McKenna <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12-09-18 11:53 AM, Richard Greenwood wrote:
>> I agree that this is the first year that nominations have been
>> publicly discussed and it is a departure from previous years. I
>> followed Jeff's lead when I nominated Chris.
>> 
>> But hey, we're an open community, I think it's even in the name
>> somewhere. And spreading a little recognition around to hard working
>> members of our community surely doesn't hurt.
>> 
> 
> My feelings exactly.  Thanks Rich.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to