On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Cameron Shorter <[email protected]> wrote:
> With my "simple maths" hat on: > Expect 150+ abstracts. Each abstract takes say 2 mins to read, think about, > and provide a ranking. > Total review time = 300 minutes = 6 hours. > > Best not to complicate the review process thus increasing review time. > Agreed - and if I was presented with a big list of 150 abstracts and 150 radio buttons from -2 to +2 I'd get to about 20 before giving up. However, a system that presented random pairs of abstracts or names and asked simply "which would you like to see?", then took a "this one/that one/dont know" response (with big fat buttons to easily click), and then presented another pair would enable reviewers to 'dip in' and do a bit more reviewing at any time. Its the "kitten war" method: http://kittenwar.com/ Barry _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
