Dear Dr. Beher, apologize me for this question, but it is not clear to me if at this stage you are asking to submit an abstract for evaluation or a full paper for evaluation.
In last years, generally I submitted an abstract, then if selected for presentation in academic track I where asked for a full paper, and then if selected I had to go trough a review process by the editors. Is it this the case, or rules have changed? Regards, Massimiliano On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Dr. Franz-Josef Behr < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I want to inform you that the final Call for Papers for FOSS4G 2013 was > published at: > > > http://2013.foss4g.org/**academic-track/call-for-**papers/<http://2013.foss4g.org/academic-track/call-for-papers/> > > The papers should be submitted in one of these formats you can find here: > > http://2013.foss4g.org/ojs/**static/FOSS4G2013_templates.**zip<http://2013.foss4g.org/ojs/static/FOSS4G2013_templates.zip> > > Note the submission deadline: 1 February 2013! > We are looking forward receiving your contributions in the fields of > > Free and Open GIS science / technology / projects. > > Best regards > > Dr. Franz-Josef Behr > - Co-chair FOSS4G 2013 Academic track - > > PS: Sorry for potential cross-posting. > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Marketing mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/marketing<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing> > -- *Massimiliano Cannata* Professore SUPSI in ingegneria Geomatica Responsabile settore Geomatica Istituto scienze della Terra Dipartimento ambiente costruszione e design Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana Campus Trevano, CH - 6952 Canobbio Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 14**** Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 09**** [email protected] *www.supsi.ch/ist*
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
