On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Barry Rowlingson < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Massimiliano Cannata > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Dr. Beher, > > apologize me for this question, but it is not clear to me if at this > stage > > you are asking to submit an abstract for evaluation or a full paper for > > evaluation. > > > > In last years, generally I submitted an abstract, then if selected for > > presentation in academic track I where asked for a full paper, > > and then if selected I had to go trough a review process by the editors. > > >From the web page: > > """ > We invite academics and researchers to submit full papers in English, > of maximum 6,000 words, before the deadline of 1 February 2013. > Templates for submissions in a variety of formats can be found here, > and detailed requirements, regarding layout, formatting and the > submission process, can be found on the FOSS4G 2103 Academic Track > submission pages at http://2013.foss4g.org/ojs/ > """ > This is clear... but then my question is: - Why do I have to submit a paper without knowing if I'm going to be select for presentation? - And why 7 months before of the conference? It looks to me quite strange... Massimiliano > > Barry > -- *Massimiliano Cannata* Professore SUPSI in ingegneria Geomatica Responsabile settore Geomatica Istituto scienze della Terra Dipartimento ambiente costruszione e design Scuola universitaria professionale della Svizzera italiana Campus Trevano, CH - 6952 Canobbio Tel. +41 (0)58 666 62 14**** Fax +41 (0)58 666 62 09**** [email protected] *www.supsi.ch/ist*
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
