Dear Venka and Massimiliano, I feel we have to defend the Foss4G2013 AT a bit here (as AT co-chairs we should ;-)
It is actually not true that "Previous FOSS4G's had abstract review by the academic committee and selected authors were asked to submit full papers closer to the conference dates." Both in the 2010 and 2011 conferences we had submission of full papers, not abstracts. The reason for this is that academics nowadays need to publish, if we want or not, and that means we have to offer a possibility of official publishing for the AT papers. The only way to achieve that is have journal outlets secured well beforehand and for that you need to set up a "Journal Type" submission and reviewing system, which means selection of full papers. Having to first select promising abstract, then ask these people to write full papers, and then have these properly peer-reviewed, all before the conference publication deadline, would mean we'd need an even earlier deadline. This by the way is nowadays accepted academic practice at conferences that offer Jopurnal publication outputs. I agree that 7 months before the conference seems like a very early deadline, but for the reviewing process, the editing and processing of accepted papers and preparation of manuscripts for publication, it actually is quite a tight time table. Note that the advantage is that if your paper is accepted, you are assured of it being actually published at the conference date, something may academics are keen for... Note also that the normal (non AT) tracks at Foss4G continue to offer submission and reviewing based on abstracts. We will have this year (as in previous years) an Academic Committee. These are the people that will be asked to do the full paper reviewing, and we have just this week invited candidates and have asked them to agree to do this important task. The list will appear on the site once the reviewing process starts. I hope this answers some of your questions. For further questions, comments and remarks, please don't hesitate to contact the Academic Track co-chairs: * Franz-Josef Behr (Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences): franz-josef.b...@hft-stuttgart.de * Barend Köbben (ITC-University of Twente): kob...@itc.nl On 2013/01/23 18:49, Massimiliano Cannata wrote: >From the web page: """ We invite academics and researchers to submit full papers in English, of maximum 6,000 words, before the deadline of 1 February 2013. Templates for submissions in a variety of formats can be found here, and detailed requirements, regarding layout, formatting and the submission process, can be found on the FOSS4G 2103 Academic Track submission pages at http://2013.foss4g.org/ojs/ """ This is clear... but then my question is: - Why do I have to submit a paper without knowing if I'm going to be select for presentation? - And why 7 months before of the conference? It looks to me quite strange... Previous FOSS4G's had abstract review by the academic committee and selected authors were asked to submit full papers closer to the conference dates. I see that we do not have an academic committee in place for FOSS4G 2013 and I agree with Maxi that the submission 1 Feb 2013 deadline for FOSS4G-2013 Academic track is too early. Venka _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss