-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
yes Andrea, but in my opinion it is not forbidden to have additional support for the other alternative. You have to implement the case sensitive KVP but it is not forbidden to implement the other additionally. Regards Sebastian - -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29 http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org Am 22.04.2013 11:25, schrieb Andrea Aime: > 2013/4/22 Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V. <[email protected]> > >> Hi, >> >> is a WMS-Client using "REQUEST=getcapabilities" instead of >> "REQUEST=GetCapabilities" still in compliance with OGC standard >> (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm >> unsure. >> >> > My understanding is that it's not. All OGC KVP protocols are based > on the following (stated in the common ows spec): "the key is case > insensitive, the value is case sensitive" > > So, something like ReQueSt=GetCapabilities is valid, but > request=getcapabilities is not > > Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer training in Milan, 6th & 7th June > 2013! Visit http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more > information. == > > Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf Technical Lead > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa > (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 > 339 8844549 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing > list [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlF1BFAACgkQq1hDh4aJykL7NACgo9QVxQUqlHe8p+SgGZC2QAVL cAwAoIDemfjwpKnXaAiyaf7OQSda8CN2 =s/wV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
