Feels like a huge attempt to undermine and side rail the OSS community. Maybe they are feeling a bit threatened.
- Nathan On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:38 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Cameron, > > I note you say disappointed rather than surprised. > > I agree, & if the contents are not made public, or at least provided to > all paying OGC members & all voting OGC members, then I fail to see how the > OGC can honestly claim the vote in any way reflects the preferences of its > membership, rather than a vote by some members who were under some sort of > pressure from a large multinational company. > > Brent Wood > > --- On *Thu, 5/9/13, Cameron Shorter <[email protected]>*wrote: > > > From: Cameron Shorter <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESRI, please publicly share reasons for given > for adopting the GeoServices REST API > To: "Craig Sandy" <[email protected]> > Cc: "OSGeo Discussions" <[email protected]>, > [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013, 4:10 PM > > > I have been notified that ESRI/OGC will not be sharing reasons for voting > for the "GeoServices REST API" that has been sent to OGC voting members. > > I'm disappointed that such information is being with held from public > debate. > > > On 8/05/2013 4:51 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote: > > Craig, > > I understand that ESRI has been emailing some OGC voting members reasons > for approving the GeoServices REST API. > > > > I think it appropriate to have an open discussion, and hear both the > pros and cons for adopting the GeoServices REST API. > > > > Could you please share your comments on a public email list so that the > community has an opportunity to hear the other side of the argument. > > > > > -- Cameron Shorter > Software and Data Solutions Manager > Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 > Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 > > Think Globally, Fix Locally > Geospatial & Data Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source > http://www.lisasoft.com > > > -- > > ------------------------------ > The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or > professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this > email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this > communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or > otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your > incorrect receipt of this correspondence. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] <http://mc/[email protected]> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
